Residents Protest Nuclear Proposal at Thyspunt

1 comment

Posted on 19th July 2010 by admin in Nuclear Energy

, , , , , ,

Nuclear Protest at Thyspunt - Jeffrey's Bay

Nuclear Protest at Thyspunt - Jeffrey's Bay

By Melanie Gosling
Environment Writer
Source

Just over 2 000 people marched through Jeffreys Bay on Sunday in protest against the multi-billion rand nuclear power station Eskom plans to build at the nearby Thyspunt.

While marchers converged on the local municipal offices where organisers handed over a memorandum, 14 chokka (squid) fishing boats dropped anchor just behind contestants in the Billabong international surfing championships and switched on their lights in support of the marchers.

The protest was organised by the Thyspunt Alliance, an umbrella body of several local resident, ratepayers, environmental, surfer and other organisations, who were joined by the chokka fishermen and a range of local people.

Allliance spokesperson Trudi Malan said on Sunday: “We thought we would not get many people because we were competing with the surfing and the rugby, but some of the surfers phoned and said please can we wait till the Kelly Slater heat had finished. We did and they all came rushing over. And some rugby fans told us they could always watch rugby again, but they may not have the opportunity to show their support again against a nuclear power station that would affect all their lives.”

Malan said the Alliance had purposely not entered the debate about the pros and cons of nuclear power, but were all opposed to siting a nuclear power station at Thyspunt. The Alliance was heavily critical of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) Eskom had commissioned, saying it had failed to address many biophysical issues of building the power plant at that spot.

Eskom had selected the site in the apartheid era with no input from the public. One of the criteria was that a site for a nuclear power station had to be at least 100km from any of the former “homeland” areas for security reasons.

“The EIA is an atrocious document. The biggest flaw is that it did not consider the chokka industry and there was no public participation in the site selection. During construction they will dump 6.3-million cubic metres of sand into the sea, which will kill the chokka industry. We do not want to jeopardise the development of our country, but we do not believe development should come at the expense of the environment,” Malan said.

Read full article

Related posts:

  1. Jeffrey’s Bay Supertubes Foundation Surf Community say NO to Nuclear Power Station at Thyspunt
  2. Eskom Nuclear Draft EIA Report Review – Comment Extension Period
  3. Eskom Nuclear 1 EIA – Fatally Flawed and Designed To Confuse
  4. Eskom Nuclear Power Station – Draft EIA – Comment Extension Period
  5. 120,000+ Say NO to Nuclear Energy in Germany – Massive Protest
1 Comments
  1. Roland Caspari says:

    Oh what a shame!
    I just wish that God is putting his hands on the heads of those politicians who think that Nuclear powerplants are the future of our green planet.
    Mr J.Zuma already made deals with Russia to get everything he need to distroy the future of humankind in South Africa and the whole world.
    I just can say please God help those people and give them some wisdom .
    We can go Green it is just a matter of our believing wich way we want to go.
    It`s time to make a change.People in SA have to stand up and i mean
    all the people of SA and say !!!!!NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! to our politicians that work with our voices in the parliament .
    I`m quite shure that the most (min.of 85%)South Africans are against Nuclear PowerPlants.So raise your voice and stand up for a Green Future –Go Solar thermic or use other clean options to supply SA with electricity .
    Love and Peace are human made.
    ( just wanna say i don`t like South Africa — i love it— please let me do so too in the future)

    Roland Caspari

    Düsseldorf , Germany

    19th July 2010 at 2:44 pm

Leave a comment

lazy-submarginal