World Bank probe of Eskom’s loan

1 comment

Posted on 4th August 2010 by admin in Eskom

, , , , , , , , ,

Eskom South Africa Energy Producer Electricity Logo

THE World Bank has started an investigation into its $3,75bn loan to Eskom after a complaint by two local environmental groups on behalf of the Lephalale community, where the Medupi power station is to be built.

Although the investigation is not expected to affect the granting of the loan, it could influence the way some of the money is spent.

Roberto Lenton, chairman of the World Bank’s inspection panel — the body leading the probe — yesterday said the investigation related to allegations of violations of the bank’s operational policies and procedures.

The inspection panel is an independent body that monitors the bank’s accountability and compliance with its social and environmental policies. It is a forum for parties aggrieved by bank policies and procedures.

Tristen Taylor, Earthlife Africa energy policy officer, yesterday said the Lephalale community was concerned about carbon and sulphur emissions from the 4800MW Medupi power station which the loan will fund.

Mr Lenton recently led a team on an “eligibility” visit to SA to investigate the Lephalale community’s concerns. In a statement to the bank’s board, Mr Lenton said he was “struck” by the level of concern about the project.

The panel decided on an investigation because the complaint by Earthlife Africa and Groundwork “raises issues of compliance and harm that can be addressed in the context of an investigation”.

Mr Lenton said his panel did not have the mandate to question board decisions, indicating that the loan would not be affected.

He said the panel would also not investigate SA and Eskom as the borrower. The panel could, however, make recommendations to the World Bank board “about project implementation, including the disbursement of funds for the project”.

In a statement yesterday, the World Bank office in Pretoria said that previous findings of the inspection panel had been taken into account in improving the design and implementation of projects.

However, the bank’s local officials declined to comment on the investigation. “The inspection panel is beginning its investigation and World Bank staff cannot comment on the specifics of ongoing investigations,” it said.

Read the full article

Source: http://www.businessday.co.za/

Related posts:

  1. Eskom Nuclear Draft EIA Report Review – Comment Extension Period
  2. Eskom looks at solar power solution to crisis
  3. Eskom told to halt project
  4. CANE RESPONSE TO ESKOM REQUEST FOR ELECTRICITY PRICE INCREASE
  5. Eskom Nuclear Power Station – Draft EIA – Comment Extension Period
1 Comments
  1. Pelindaba Working Group says:

    Press Release: $3.75 Billion World Bank Loan to Eskom to Face Full
    Enquiry
    groundWork, Earthlife Africa Jhb
    4th of August 2010

    The World Bank Inspection Panel it to undertake a full investigation of
    the $3.75 billion loan by the World Bank to Eskom, the South African
    energy utility. This was the finding of the preliminary investigation
    undertaken in May 2010. In April 2010, local residents in the Waterberg,
    Limpopo Province, addressed their concerns on inter alia health,
    environment, cultural and human rights issues to the Inspection Panel.
    [1]

    At a full World Bank board meeting on the 29th of July, Mr. Roberto
    Lenton Chairperson of the Inspection Panel stated that, ‘based on its
    review of the relevant documentation and its field visit, and taking
    into account the sharply different views of the Requesters and
    Management, the Panel considered that the Request raises important
    issues of compliance and harm that can be addressed only in the context
    of an investigation.’ [2]

    This full investigation it to be undertaken despite the South African
    government, backed by Algeria and Saudi Arabian Executive Directors of
    the World Bank requesting an almost unprecedented full meeting to
    discuss the project in an unsuccessful ploy to challenge the complaint
    and limit its scope.

    ‘This action highlights South African government’s anxiety about the
    fact that community people and NGO’s have raised concern about this
    project, and that there is truth in their evidence’ says Bobby Peek,
    Director of groundWork, Friends of the Earth South Africa who submitted
    together with Earthlife Africa Johannesburg a call for the inspection on
    behalf of the local community in the Waterberg.

    Tristen Taylor of Earthlife Africa Johannesburg, raises the importance
    of being on the ground with the local people to understand the
    environmental justice impacts. ‘When the inspection panel came to South
    Africa, interviewed the people, went to the area and actually saw what
    is going to happen and what is already happening, they got a bit of a
    wake-up call’.

    Both groundWork and Earthlife Africa Jhb remain concerned about the
    conflict of interest between the World Bank loan, the Medupi power
    station, and the ANC’s financial stake in Chancellor House. This issue
    remains a blight upon the body politic of South Africa.

    Earthlife Africa and groundWork together with our international allies
    especially those in Washington will continue to work with the local
    people to prepare for the full investigation.

    For more information, please contact:

    Bobby Peek
    Director
    groundWork
    Cell: 082 464 1383
    Email: bobby@groundwork.org.za
    Website: http://www.groundwork.org.za

    Tristen Taylor
    Project Co-ordinator
    Earthlife Africa Jhb
    Tel: 011 339-3662
    Cell: 084 250-2434
    Email: tristen@earthlife.org.za
    Website: http://www.earthlife.org.za

    Footnotes:

    [1]
    http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTINSPECTIONPANEL/Resources/Request_for_Inspection_(PUBLIC).pdf

    [2]
    http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTINSPECTIONPANEL/Resources/Final_Elig_Rpt_for_Disclosure.pdf

    4th August 2010 at 7:58 pm

Leave a comment

lazy-submarginal