Eskom Nuclear 1 EIA Meetings – Legal Challenges

Posted on 9th June 2011 by admin in Eskom

, , , , ,

Related posts:

  1. ESKOM CONTINUES TO DENY NUCLEAR ENERGY FACTS
  2. Eskom Nuclear Draft EIA Report Review – Comment Extension Period
  3. Eskom Environmental Impact Assessment (DEA Ref. No.: 12/12/20/944) – Revised Draft EIA
  4. UNPLUG NUCLEAR! Protect Our Workers! NO NUKES IN AFRICA!
  5. No Amount of Redesign Will Save the PBMR

Eskom Environmental Impact Assessment (DEA Ref. No.: 12/12/20/944) – Revised Draft EIA

Posted on 30th April 2011 by admin in Eskom

, , , ,

Related posts:

  1. Eskom Nuclear Power Station – Draft EIA – Comment Extension Period
  2. Eskom Nuclear Draft EIA Report Review – Comment Extension Period
  3. Draft IRP2010 Out for Public Comment – Comment Period Closes 10 November – IT IS YOUR TIME TO TALK and say NO TO NUCLEAR !!!
  4. Eskom Nuclear 1 EIA – Fatally Flawed and Designed To Confuse
  5. CANE RESPONSE TO ESKOM REQUEST FOR ELECTRICITY PRICE INCREASE

World Bank probe of Eskom’s loan

Posted on 4th August 2010 by admin in Eskom

, , , , , , , , ,

Related posts:

  1. Eskom Nuclear Draft EIA Report Review – Comment Extension Period
  2. Eskom looks at solar power solution to crisis
  3. Eskom told to halt project
  4. CANE RESPONSE TO ESKOM REQUEST FOR ELECTRICITY PRICE INCREASE
  5. Eskom Nuclear Power Station – Draft EIA – Comment Extension Period

Government pulls plug on PBMR

Posted on 20th July 2010 by Pelindaba Working Group in Alternative Energy |Blogroll |DME - Minerals and Energy |Eskom |NECSA - Nuclear Corporation of SA |Nuclear Energy |Nuclear Waste |PBMR - Pebble Bed |Pollution |Radiation

, ,

Related posts:

  1. No Amount of Redesign Will Save the PBMR
  2. PBMR Fuel Factory at Pelindaba ROD to be amended yet again – register now
  3. ESKOM’s NUCLEAR DECISION IS NO CAUSE FOR OPTIMISM
  4. Is SAs scandalous PBMR nuclear experiment the real reason for Dalai Lama blunder
  5. PBMR contract awarded to M&R

What can I do about preventing a nuclear future?

Posted on 13th June 2010 by Pelindaba Working Group in Alternative Energy |DME - Minerals and Energy |Eskom |NECSA - Nuclear Corporation of SA |Nuclear Energy |Nuclear Waste |Press Releases |Radiation

Related posts:

  1. SAs future energy policy needs greater public scrutiny, input
  2. State Sees Bright Future in Nuclear Energy
  3. Urgent call to Parliament to debate nuclear policy before Nuke Bill is gazetted
  4. Nuclear Power Has No Place in the Kyoto Protocol – NIRS petition
  5. ESKOM’s NUCLEAR DECISION IS NO CAUSE FOR OPTIMISM
lazy-submarginal